It therefore seems very wrong
Jan 22, 2024 6:04:35 GMT 1
Post by messi05 on Jan 22, 2024 6:04:35 GMT 1
Want to reduce legal demands by further restricting the rights of Brazilian citizens, conditioning access to justice. Transferring the conflict from the judicial route to the extrajudicial route does not solve the problem of consumer conflicts in Brazil. What could really solve this would be strict supervision and punishment for rights violations committed by suppliers and, above all, the strengthening of the collective means of resolving conflicts, both administratively and judicially. A second point that must be mentioned is that the introduction of new ways of dealing with conflicts, especially through self-compositive methods, is not intended to reduce legal actions.
De judicialization is not the cause, but one of the Buy Phone Number List consequences of the existence of extrajudicial methods. The need to create and, above all, legitimize new ways of resolving conflicts arises from the recognition that not every conflict needs to turn into litigation, as the litigious route is not always the most appropriate. The appreciation of self-compositional methods arises, therefore, from the perception that the notion of justice presupposes adequate treatment of the conflict and adequate treatment means offering the best path to solution for each type of conflict. The role of the Judiciary today, therefore, is to offer a structure in which the most appropriate treatment can be identified for each type of conflict, whether through legal action, or through other methods, such as conciliation or mediation.
The conciliation route was presented a long time ago to resolve consumer conflicts, through the institution of special civil courts and, unfortunately, it failed. Today, mediation appears as a favorite option, but the fact is that in most cases it does not present itself as the most efficient method for resolving consumer conflicts, for which it is generally enough to work on positions, and not necessarily interests. of those involved. In this context, a third important question arises, which concerns the public interest in consumer protection.
De judicialization is not the cause, but one of the Buy Phone Number List consequences of the existence of extrajudicial methods. The need to create and, above all, legitimize new ways of resolving conflicts arises from the recognition that not every conflict needs to turn into litigation, as the litigious route is not always the most appropriate. The appreciation of self-compositional methods arises, therefore, from the perception that the notion of justice presupposes adequate treatment of the conflict and adequate treatment means offering the best path to solution for each type of conflict. The role of the Judiciary today, therefore, is to offer a structure in which the most appropriate treatment can be identified for each type of conflict, whether through legal action, or through other methods, such as conciliation or mediation.
The conciliation route was presented a long time ago to resolve consumer conflicts, through the institution of special civil courts and, unfortunately, it failed. Today, mediation appears as a favorite option, but the fact is that in most cases it does not present itself as the most efficient method for resolving consumer conflicts, for which it is generally enough to work on positions, and not necessarily interests. of those involved. In this context, a third important question arises, which concerns the public interest in consumer protection.